Termination w.r.t. Q proof of TRS/higher-order/AotoYam006.trs

Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could be proven:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app(app(mapbt, f), app(leaf, x)) → app(leaf, app(f, x))
app(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → app(app(app(branch, app(f, x)), app(app(mapbt, f), l)), app(app(mapbt, f), r))

Q is empty.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app(app(mapbt, f), app(leaf, x)) → app(leaf, app(f, x))
app(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → app(app(app(branch, app(f, x)), app(app(mapbt, f), l)), app(app(mapbt, f), r))

Q is empty.

The TRS is overlay and locally confluent. By [15] we can switch to innermost.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app(app(mapbt, f), app(leaf, x)) → app(leaf, app(f, x))
app(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → app(app(app(branch, app(f, x)), app(app(mapbt, f), l)), app(app(mapbt, f), r))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

app(app(mapbt, x0), app(leaf, x1))
app(app(mapbt, x0), app(app(app(branch, x1), x2), x3))

Using Dependency Pairs [1,13] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

APP(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → APP(app(mapbt, f), r)
APP(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → APP(app(mapbt, f), l)
APP(app(mapbt, f), app(leaf, x)) → APP(f, x)
APP(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → APP(app(branch, app(f, x)), app(app(mapbt, f), l))
APP(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → APP(app(app(branch, app(f, x)), app(app(mapbt, f), l)), app(app(mapbt, f), r))
APP(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → APP(branch, app(f, x))
APP(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → APP(f, x)
APP(app(mapbt, f), app(leaf, x)) → APP(leaf, app(f, x))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app(app(mapbt, f), app(leaf, x)) → app(leaf, app(f, x))
app(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → app(app(app(branch, app(f, x)), app(app(mapbt, f), l)), app(app(mapbt, f), r))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

app(app(mapbt, x0), app(leaf, x1))
app(app(mapbt, x0), app(app(app(branch, x1), x2), x3))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

APP(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → APP(app(mapbt, f), r)
APP(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → APP(app(mapbt, f), l)
APP(app(mapbt, f), app(leaf, x)) → APP(f, x)
APP(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → APP(app(branch, app(f, x)), app(app(mapbt, f), l))
APP(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → APP(app(app(branch, app(f, x)), app(app(mapbt, f), l)), app(app(mapbt, f), r))
APP(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → APP(branch, app(f, x))
APP(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → APP(f, x)
APP(app(mapbt, f), app(leaf, x)) → APP(leaf, app(f, x))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app(app(mapbt, f), app(leaf, x)) → app(leaf, app(f, x))
app(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → app(app(app(branch, app(f, x)), app(app(mapbt, f), l)), app(app(mapbt, f), r))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

app(app(mapbt, x0), app(leaf, x1))
app(app(mapbt, x0), app(app(app(branch, x1), x2), x3))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We deleted some edges using various graph approximations

↳ QTRS

  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

            ↳ QDP

              ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

APP(app(mapbt, f), app(leaf, x)) → APP(f, x)
APP(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → APP(app(mapbt, f), l)
APP(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → APP(app(mapbt, f), r)
APP(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → APP(app(branch, app(f, x)), app(app(mapbt, f), l))
APP(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → APP(app(app(branch, app(f, x)), app(app(mapbt, f), l)), app(app(mapbt, f), r))
APP(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → APP(branch, app(f, x))
APP(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → APP(f, x)
APP(app(mapbt, f), app(leaf, x)) → APP(leaf, app(f, x))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app(app(mapbt, f), app(leaf, x)) → app(leaf, app(f, x))
app(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → app(app(app(branch, app(f, x)), app(app(mapbt, f), l)), app(app(mapbt, f), r))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

app(app(mapbt, x0), app(leaf, x1))
app(app(mapbt, x0), app(app(app(branch, x1), x2), x3))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [13,14,18] contains 1 SCC with 4 less nodes.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

            ↳ QDP

              ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                ↳ QDP

                  ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

APP(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → APP(app(mapbt, f), r)
APP(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → APP(app(mapbt, f), l)
APP(app(mapbt, f), app(leaf, x)) → APP(f, x)
APP(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → APP(f, x)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app(app(mapbt, f), app(leaf, x)) → app(leaf, app(f, x))
app(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → app(app(app(branch, app(f, x)), app(app(mapbt, f), l)), app(app(mapbt, f), r))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

app(app(mapbt, x0), app(leaf, x1))
app(app(mapbt, x0), app(app(app(branch, x1), x2), x3))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

APP(app(mapbt, f), app(leaf, x)) → APP(f, x)
APP(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → APP(f, x)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

APP(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → APP(app(mapbt, f), r)
APP(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → APP(app(mapbt, f), l)

Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
APP(x1, x2) = x1
app(x1, x2) = app(x2)
mapbt = mapbt
branch = branch
leaf = leaf

Recursive Path Order [2].
Precedence:

mapbt > app₁
branch > app₁
leaf > app₁

The following usable rules [14] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

            ↳ QDP

              ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                ↳ QDP

                  ↳ QDPOrderProof

                    ↳ QDP

                      ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

APP(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → APP(app(mapbt, f), l)
APP(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → APP(app(mapbt, f), r)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app(app(mapbt, f), app(leaf, x)) → app(leaf, app(f, x))
app(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → app(app(app(branch, app(f, x)), app(app(mapbt, f), l)), app(app(mapbt, f), r))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

app(app(mapbt, x0), app(leaf, x1))
app(app(mapbt, x0), app(app(app(branch, x1), x2), x3))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13]. Here, we combined the reduction pair processor with the A-transformation [14] which results in the following intermediate Q-DP Problem.
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MAPBT(f, branch(x, l, r)) → MAPBT(f, l)
MAPBT(f, branch(x, l, r)) → MAPBT(f, r)

R is empty.
The set Q consists of the following terms:

mapbt(x0, leaf(x1))
mapbt(x0, branch(x1, x2, x3))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

APP(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → APP(app(mapbt, f), l)
APP(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → APP(app(mapbt, f), r)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
MAPBT(x1, x2) = x2
branch(x1, x2, x3) = branch(x2, x3)

Recursive Path Order [2].
Precedence:

trivial

The following usable rules [14] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

            ↳ QDP

              ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                ↳ QDP

                  ↳ QDPOrderProof

                    ↳ QDP

                      ↳ QDPOrderProof

                        ↳ QDP

                          ↳ PisEmptyProof

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app(app(mapbt, f), app(leaf, x)) → app(leaf, app(f, x))
app(app(mapbt, f), app(app(app(branch, x), l), r)) → app(app(app(branch, app(f, x)), app(app(mapbt, f), l)), app(app(mapbt, f), r))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

app(app(mapbt, x0), app(leaf, x1))
app(app(mapbt, x0), app(app(app(branch, x1), x2), x3))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.